Науковий вісник НГУ

Analysis of permanent magnet positioning for improving performance and preventing demagnetization of LSPMSM

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2026

Category: Content №3 2026

Created on 26 June 2026

Last Updated on 26 June 2026

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by Le Anh Tuan, Tran Duy Khanh, Do Nhu Y

Hits: 796

Authors:

Le Anh Tuan, orcid.org/0009-0001-8695-7457, Hanoi University of Industry, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi, Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Tran Duy Khanh*, orcid.org/0009-0000-4365-8679, Saodo University, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Haiphong, Socialist Republic of Vietnam, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Do Nhu Y, orcid.org/0000-0001-6395-2875, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi, Socialist Republic of Vietnam

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2026, (3): 056 - 065

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2026-3/056

Abstract:

Purpose. To analyse the positioning of permanent magnets (PMs) to ensure operational parameters and prevent irreversible demagnetization (ID) during the startup of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motors (LSPMSMs).

Methodology. The research methods include theoretical methods to analyze ID phenomena and the operational parameters of the LSPMSM. The results are then validated using the finite element method in Ansys/Maxwell Version R2 2021.

Findings. The research results indicate that the PMs’ positioning in the rotor not only affects the operational parameters of the LSPMSM but also influences the PMs’ ID susceptibility. A model of a 15 kW, 2-pole LSPMSM with a symmetrical three-magnet structure and a PM slot distance, L_p (the distance from the axis center to the PM slot), ranging from 29.5 to 33.5 mm is investigated. The results show that the smaller the distance L_p, the better the LSPMSM’s startup characteristics, with the best occurring at L_p = 29.5 mm. Conversely, as L_p increases, the current characteristics and efficiency improve. To achieve an efficiency rating of IE4 according to the IEC standard (³ 93.3 %) without exceeding 5 % ID of the PMs, it is required that 33.5 ³ L_p ³ 31.5 mm. The highest efficiency of 94.2 % is achieved at L_p = 33.5 mm.

Originality. The magnet slot distance L_p is analysed in relation to the ID capacity of the PMs. The results demonstrate that not only the size of the PMs but also their positioning affects their parameters and ID susceptibility. Based on the findings, it is recommended to select L_p with a reasonable value to not only avoid partial ID but also ensure the operational parameters of the LSPMSM remain consistent with the initial design.

Practical value. The research results indicate that in the design of the LSPMSM, not only the PM size but also the PM slot distance L_p must be considered to avoid PM ID and ensure the motor’s operating parameters.

Keywords: permanent magnet, irreversible demagnetization, synchornous motor, electric motor, magnet positioning

References.

1. Zhang, J. (2024). Energy access challenge and the role of fossil fuels in meeting electricity demand: Promoting renewable energy capacity for sustainable development. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(5), 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101873

2. Saidur, R. (2010). A review on electrical motors energy use and energy savings. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 14(3), 877-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.018

3. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., & Accordini, D. (2019). Energy efficiency measures in electric motors systems: A novel classification highlighting specific implications in their adoption. Applied Energy, 252, 113481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113481

4. Ugale, R. T., Singh, G., Baka, S., & Chaudhari, B. N. (2009). Effective energy conservation for the agricultural sector using line start permanent magnet synchronous motors. TENCON 2009-2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2009.5395904

5. Duc, H. B., Dinh, B. M., & Vuong, D. Q. (2022). Analytical and FEM methods for line start permanent magnet synchronous motor of 2.2 kW. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 55(6), 715. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.550603

6. Le Anh, T., Trong, C. T., Duc, C. Q., & Do Nhu, Y. (2024). Applying FEA for Designing a High Efficiency 2.2 kW, 2p = 4 Line Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor. International Conference on Engineering Research and Applications, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03856-2_15

7. Janjamraj, N., & Thongchai, P. (2020). Development of Energy Efficiency Standard and Regulation for Electric Motors in Thailand. 17 ^th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTI-CON49241.2020.9158119

8. Pechlivanidou, M. S., & Kladas, A. G. (2019). Comparison of alternate LSPMSM topologies considering both transient and steady-state operating characteristics. IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD), 1, 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEMDCD.2019.8887806

9. Behbahanifard, H., & Sadoughi, A. (2016). Cogging torque reduction in line start permanent magnet synchronous motor. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 11(4), 878-888. https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2016.11.4.878

10.      Do, N. Y., Le, T. A., & Ngo, X. C. (2022). Effect of Permanent Magnet Structure on The Performance of LSPMSM with a Power of 22 kW and 3000 rpm. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1111(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1111/1/012047

11.      Akçomak, M., & Partal, S. Z. (2024). Design of a 2.2 kW 4-Pole IE5 Efficiency Class Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor. 6 ^th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1109/GPECOM61896.2024.10582573

12.      Ugale, R. T., & Chaudhari, B. N. (2013). A new rotor structure for line start permanent magnet synchronous motor. International Electric Machines & Drives Conference, 1436-1442. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMDC.2013.6556326

13.      Lembhe, A., Sarode, S., & Lenin, N. C. (2023). Design and analysis of LSPMSM and effect of stator slots on efficiency. Second international virtual conference on intelligent robotics, mechatronics and automation systems (IRMAS2022), 2788(1), 120001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148911

14.      Qiu, H., Zhang, Y., Hu, K., Yang, C., & Yi, R. (2019). The influence of stator winding turns on the steady-state performances of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motors. Energies, 12(12), 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122363

15.      Palangar, M. F., Mahmoudi, A., Soong, W. L., & Kahourzade, S. (2020). Design optimisation of an 8-pole line-start permanent-magnet synchronous motor. 2 ^nd International conference on Electrical, Control and Instrumentation Engineering (ICECIE), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECIE50279.2020.9309557

16.      Jędryczka, C., Knypiński, Ł., Demenko, A., & Sykulski, J. K. (2018). Methodology for cage shape optimization of a permanent magnet synchronous motor under line start conditions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 54(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.2764680

17.      Xie, Q., Li, S., Zhao, Z., Ren, B., Song, K., Zhong, Y., & Lei, X. (2025). Multi-objective Optimization of RSM Model Considering the LSPMSM’s Transient and Steady-state Performances Coordination. Engineering Research Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ade1a7

18.      Pecho, J., & Hofmann, W. (2019). Analysis of the effects of parameter variations on the start-up characteristics of LSPMSM. 21 ^st European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’19 ECCE Europe), P-1. https://doi.org/10.23919/EPE.2019.8914800

19.      Zhao, W., Tian, M., Wang, X., & Sun, Y. (2020). Analysis of the synchronization process and the synchronization capability for a novel 6/8-pole changing LSPMSM. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 56(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2019.2953286

20.      Szelag, W., Jedryczka, C., & Baranski, M. (2024). A New Method of Reducing the Inrush Current and Improving the Starting Performance of a Line-Start Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor. Energies, 17(5), 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051040

21.      McElveen, R. F., Budzynski, R., Jarvinen, J., & Martin, W. E. (2022). Solving the synchronization problem of line start permanent magnet motors. IEEE IAS Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference (PCIC), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCIC42668.2022.10181289

22.      Thuy, T. B., Cuong, N. X., & Do Nhu, Y. (2023). Effect of permanent magnet structure on working characteristics of lspmsm 3000 rpm. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1275(1), 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1275/1/012049

23.      Tang, X., & Wang, X. (2014). Research of the demagnetization mechanism of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor under operating condition of sudden reversal. 17 ^th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 1981-1984. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMS.2014.7013826

24.      Le Anh, T., Bien, T. T., Xuan, C. N., Do Anh, T., & Do Nhu, Y. (2024). Analysis of permanent magnet demagnetization during the starting process of a line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(6), 17900-17905. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8576

25.      Yu, P., Zhu, C., Shen, Y., & Zhang, G. (2018). Demagnetization analysis of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motors during its starting process. 2018 3 ^rd International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering (EAME 2018), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.2991/eame-18.2018.11

26.      Zawilak, T., & Jędryczka, C. (2023). Risk of irreversible demagnetisation under transient states of the line start permanent magnet synchronous motor taking into account magnet temperature. Archives of Electrical Engineering, 1107-1119. https://doi.org/10.24425/aee.2023.147429

27.      Tang, X., Wang, X., Li, G., & Tian, M. (2016). Demagnetization study of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor under out-of-step and supersynchronous faults. 2016 IEEE 11^th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 1496-1501. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2016.7603822

28.      Li, D., Feng, G., Li, W., Zhang, B., Xu, Y., Chen, Y., & Wu, Q. (2023). Irreversible Demagnetization of a Large Capacity Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors considering Influence of Permanent Magnet Temperature. International transactions on electrical energy systems, 2023(1), 6798493. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6798493

29.      Baranski, M., Szelag, W., & Jedryczka, C. (2017). Influence of temperature on partial demagnetization of the permanent magnets during starting process of line start permanent magnet synchronous motor. International Symposium on Electrical Machines (SME), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEM.2017.7993535

30.      Silveyra, J. M., Ferrara, E., Huber, D. L., & Monson, T. C. (2018). Soft magnetic materials for a sustainable and electrified world. Science, 362(6413), eaao0195. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao01

31.      Waheed, A., & Ro, J. (2020). Analytical modeling for optimal rotor shape to design highly efficient line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE access, 8, 145672-145686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014718

32.      Le, A. T., Lan, N. T., Do, N. Y., & Bun, H. V. (2025). Studying the Effect of PM Thickness on the Back-EMF and Power Factor of LSPMSM. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.580307

• < Prev
• Next >