Assessment of the tax system under conditions of sustainable development

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:


H. Jafarli, orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-2426, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan, е-mаіl: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M. S. Bril, orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-7747, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I. O. Dzemishkevych, orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-2241, RJSC HEI Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mаіl: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. O. Hutorova, orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-5482, State Biotechnological University, Kharkiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S. V. Rudenko, orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-1957, State Biotechnological University, Kharkiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T. A. Vlasenko*, orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-2423, Academy of Silesia, Katowice, Republic of Poland; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (6): 189 - 201

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-6/189



Abstract:



Purpose.
To evaluate the socio-economic determinants of tax-system sustainability within the Sustainable Development Goals framework for 28 European Union countries and Ukraine in 2023–2024.


Methodology.
A cross-country dataset of nine independent indicators was compiled for 28 national economies. Factor analysis was applied to identify latent drivers of tax-system sustainability, followed by cluster analysis to group countries by similar profiles and to assess the stability of country positions over time. A comparative assessment focused on Ukraine, where martial law remains in force.


Findings.
A four-factor structure was established: (F1) resource load and environmental consequences; (F2) economic structure and tax burden; (F3) socio-economic tension; (F4) economic well-being. Factors F1, F2, and F4 are positively associated with the sustainability of national tax systems, whereas F3 acts in the opposite direction. Countries exhibit marked heterogeneity across factors; cluster membership remained largely stable between 2023 and 2024, with Portugal as the sole reclassification. The factor-based assessment (FI) revealed country-specific risks and priorities for fiscal adjustment. The Ukraine–EU comparison demonstrated consistent patterns within the assigned clusters, considering the dynamics of actual factor values.


Originality.
The study operationalizes tax-system sustainability through an integrated four-factor construct that jointly captures environmental pressure, fiscal-structural characteristics, social stress, and economic well-being, and tests cluster stability on a recent EU–Ukraine panel.


Practical value.
The results provide a transparent diagnostic for risk-sensitive tax-policy design aligned with sustainable development. They support the identification of targeted measures and sequencing of reforms; for Ukraine, they inform adaptive fiscal decisions under martial law and during economic recovery.



Keywords:
taxes, tax policy, sustainable development, security, threats, governance, financial resources

References.


1. Perevozova, I., Malynka, O., Nitsenko, V., Kryshtal, H., Kos­tiuk, V., & Mishchenko, V. (2023). Analysis of Trends in Mortgage Lending in the Agricultural Sector of Ukraine. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16, 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16050255

2. Mardan, M., & Stimmelmayr, M. (2020). Tax competition between developed, emerging, and developing countries–Same but different? Journal of Development Economics, 146, 102491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102491

3. Richards, N. U. (2021). Sustainable development goals and taxation in Nigeria. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 47(3), 570-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2020.1818594

4. Azlan Annuar, H., Isa, K., Ibrahim, S.A., & Solarin, S. A. (2018). Malaysian corporate tax rate and revenue: the application of Ibn Khaldun tax theory. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 10(2), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-07-2017-0011

5. Rahman, Md. M. (2023). Impact of taxes on the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Evidence from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Regional Sustainability, 4(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.07.001

6. Zayed, N. M., Mohamed, I. S., Islam, K. M. A., Perevozova, I., Nitsenko, V., & Morozova, O. (2022). Factors Influencing the Financial Situation and Management of Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120554

7. Kanbur, R., Paukkeri, T., Pirttilä, J., & Tuomala, M. (2017). Optimal taxation and public provision for poverty reduction. International Tax and Public Finance, 25(1), 64-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9443-6

8. Samour, A., Shahzad, U., & Mentel, G. (2022). Moving toward sustainable development: Assessing the impacts of taxation and banking development on renewable energy in the UAE. Renewable Energy, 200, 706-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.020

9. Heimberger, P. (2021). Corporate Tax Competition: A Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 69, 102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102002

10.      Asen, E. (2020). Corporate Tax Rates around the World, 2020. Tax Foundation. Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/global/corporate-tax-rates-around-the-world-2020/

11.      Kawano, L., & Slemrod, J. (2015). How do corporate tax bases change when corporate tax rates change? With implications for the tax rate elasticity of corporate tax revenues. International Tax and Public Finance, 23(3), 401-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9375-y

12.      Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Jato-Espino, D., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2018). Is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) index an adequate framework to measure the progress of the 2030 Agenda? Sustainable Development, 26(6), 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1735

13.      Jahnsen, K., & Pomerleau, K. (2017). Corporate Income Tax Rates Around the World, Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact. 559. Retrieved from https://files.taxfoundation.org/20170907092820/Tax-Foundation-FF559.pdf

14.      Nitsenko, V., Ivashchenko, A., Radko, V., Sereda, V., Kuzmenko, O., & Dimov, I. (2024). Financial Potential for Expanding the Opportunities of a Small Enterprise Under the Conditions of Sustainable Development. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(59), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.59.2024.4524

15.      Gechert, S., & Heimberger, P. (2022). Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth? European Economic Review, 147, 104157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104157

16.      Marques, M., Pinho, C., & Montenegro, T. M. (2019). The effect of international income shifting on the link between real investment and corporate taxation. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.100268

17.      Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). Sustainable Development Report 2021. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106559

18.      Brezhnieva-Yermolenko, O., Hanziuk, S., Gurzhiy, T., Nitsenkо, V., & Mazur, Yu. (2025). Development of the financial monitoring system to increase the level of financial security of Ukraine in the conditions of threats. Economics of Development, 24(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.63341/econ/2.2025.103

19.      Peterson, T., & Bair, Z. (2022). United States Tax Rates and Economic Growth. Sage Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221114324

20.      Deb, B. C., Rahman, Md. M., & Rahman, M. S. (2022). The impact of environmental management accounting on environmental and financial performance: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(3), 420-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2021-0157

21.      Rahman, Md. M., & Halim, Md. A. (2022). Does the export-to-import ratio affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from BRICS countries. Energy & Environment, 35(2), 904-926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x221134946

22.      Poluyanenko, N., Kuznetsov, A., Lisickiy, K., Datsenko, S., Nakisko, O., & Rudenko, S. (2020). The Problem of Double Costs in Blockchain Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (pp. 640-652). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55506-1_57

23.      Kryukova, I., Zamlynskyi, V., & Vlasenko, T. (2023). Architecture of corporate reporting on the sustainable development of business entities in the agrarian sector as a tool of sustainable agri-management. Ekonomika APK, 30(2), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202302038

24.      Alekseievska, H., Bril, M., Kotenok, A., Tomchuk, O., Bu­diaiev, M., & Popenko, S. (2024). Monetary instruments in addressing economic crises: effectiveness and challenges. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(58), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.5.58.2024.4504

25.      Hutorov, A. O., Hutorova, O. O., Lupenko, Y. O., Yermolenko, O. A., & Voronko-Nevidnycha, T. V. (2019). Modelling of the cycle of reproduction process in the agrarian sector of economy (Ukraine). Espacios, 40(7), 19.

26.      Ivanchenkov, V., Vovk, V., Yermolenko, O., Prusova, G., & Revenko, O. (2024). Innovative factors ensuring strategic changes in sectors of the national economy. Economics of Development, 23(4), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.57111/econ/4.2024.20

27.      Nerudova, D., Janova, J., Hampel, D., Dobranschi, M., & Rozmahel, P. (2019). Sustainability of the taxation systems in the EU: a proposal of an evaluation model. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5c1f6e730&appId=PPGMS

28.      MinFin (2025). Retrieved from https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/gdp/

29.      Eurostat (2025). Main tax aggregates of national accounts. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/GOV_10A_TAXAG__custom_8238014/bookmark/table?lang=en&bookmarkId=7c81cd0c-9c2f-4d5f-9506-8d480291f076

30.      Ministry of Economy of Ukraine (2022). Trends of the shadow economy. Retrieved from https://www.me.gov.ua/Documents/List?lang=uk-UA&id=e384c5a7-6533-4ab6-b56f-50e5243eb15a&tag=TendentsiiTinovoiEkonomiki

 

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (066) 379 72 44.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home About the journal EngCat Archive 2025 Content №6 2025 Assessment of the tax system under conditions of sustainable development