Scientific, technical and ecological aspects of expanding the fuel base of energy and cement production due to petroleum coke

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:


M. V. Chernyavskyy*, orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-4984, Thermal Energy Technology Institute of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. Yu. Provalov, orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-2259, Thermal Energy Technology Institute of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (6): 127 - 135

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-6/127



Abstract:



Purpose.
Generalization of experience in the fuel use of petroleum coke using various combustion technologies and development of scientific foundations for its use for rotary kilns in the production of Portland cement clinker in compliance with environmental requirements.


Methodology.
Determination of the efficiency of sulfur capturing in a rotary kiln and in a decarbonizer based on the material balance of sulfur in raw materials, fuel and clinker. Determination of the permissible content of petroleum coke in fuel based on the calculating of the level of sulfur dioxide emissions using the found sulfur binding coefficient.


Findings.
It is shown that petroleum coke is equivalent to high-sulfur lean coal as a fuel. The experience of using petroleum coke in power plants with circulating fluidized bed (CFB) and pulverized combustion, in particular, in the boiler of the 800 MW power unit of the Slovianska TPP, is analyzed. The technology of “dry” cement production is considered. It is proven that the conditions of petcoke combustion in a rotary kiln for clinker calcination, calcium carbonate decomposition in a decarbonizer, and calcium oxide contact with sulfur dioxide coincide with the optimal conditions for sulfur capturing in the technology of coal CFB. The efficiency of sulfur capturing in a rotary kiln and in a decarbonizer is determined based on the material balance of sulfur in raw materials, fuel, and clinker. The permissible content of petroleum coke in fuel for pulverized combustion and for rotary kilns is determined based on the calculation of the level of sulfur dioxide emissions using the found sulfur binding coefficient. Recommendations for the use of petroleum coke in cement production to expand its fuel base while complying with environmental requirements are provided.


Originality.
The efficiency of sulfur binding of solid fuel in a rotary kiln and in a decarbonizer is determined. It is proven that in the technology of “dry” cement production with a higher proportion of petroleum coke in the fuel, sulfur dioxide emissions are 11 times lower than in pulverized combustion. A methodology for assessing the permissible content of petroleum coke in fuel for a rotary kiln is developed.


Practical value.
The advantages of using petroleum coke as fuel for rotary kilns in clinker production are proven. The permissible content of petroleum coke in fuel is determined while meeting EU environmental requirements. Recommendations are provided for the use of petroleum coke in cement production to expand its fuel base.



Keywords:
petroleum coke, hard coal, Portland cement clinker, rotary kiln, decarbonizer

References.


1. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide (2013). EU. Retrieved from https://mepr.gov.ua/dovidkovi-dokumenty-z-ndtm-vyrobnytstvo-tsementu-vapna-i-oksydu-magniyu

2. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (n.d.). Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_004-10#n970

3. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (n.d.). Technological standards for permissible emissions of pollutants from equipment (installations) for the production of cement clinker in rotary kilns with a production capacity exceeding 500 tons per day. Approved by the Order of the Ministry of Environment of Ukraine dated 20.01.2009 No. 23. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0120-09#Text

4. Mancuso, L., & Arienti, S. (2017). Petroleum coke (petcoke) and refinery residues. In T. Wang & G. Stiegel (Eds.). Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technologies, (pp. 121-144). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100167-7.00003-2

5. PermuTrade (n.d.). Is Petroleum Coke The Same As Coal? Retrieved from https://www.permutrade.com/is-petroleum-coke-the-same-as-coal

6. Gadhavi, G., & Solanki, H. (2022). A review: sulfur in coal and petroleum coke. International Association of Biologicals and Computational Digest, 1(2), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.56588/iabcd.v1i2.81

7. Petroleum Coke: A Comprehensive Guide to Production, Specifications, and Types. London Premier Centre (2024). Retrieved from https://www.lpcentre.com/articles/petroleum-coke-a-comprehensive-guide-to-production-specifications-and-types

8. Tillman, D., Duong, D., & Harding, N. S. (2012). Solid fuel blending: Principles, practices, and problems. Butterworth-Heinemann.

9. Alekhnovich, A. N., Bogomolov, V. V., & Artem’eva, N. V. (2019). Petroleum coke characteristics and use in power industry. Power Technology and Engineering, 53, 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-019-01081-1

10.      Chernyavskyy, M. V., Dunayevska, N. I., Provalov, O. Yu., & Miroshnichenko, Ye. S. (2020). Scientific basis and technologies of anthracite replacement at thermal power plants. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/033

11.      Chernyavsky, N., Provalov, O., Kosyachkov, O., & Bestsennyy, I. (2021). Scientific bases, experience of production and combustion of coal mixtures at thermal power plants of Ukraine. Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management, 8(1), 23-31. Retrieved from http://www.procedia-esem.eu/pdf/issues/2021/no1/4_01.04_ Chernyavskiy_21.pdf

12.      Provalov, O. Yu., Kosyachkov, O. V., & Roskolupa, A. I. (2019). Experience of preparation and combustion of anthracite mixtures with petroleum coke and gas coal at Sloviansk TPP. 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Coal Thermal Power Engineering: Ways of Reconstruction and Development”, (pp. 110-113). IVE NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://www.ceti-nasu.org.ua/upload/iblock/71a/71ae934a8c8b90e58f1c1933159f732d.pdf

13.      Ministry of Environment of Ukraine (2008, October 22). Technological standards for permissible emissions of pollutants from thermal power installations with a nominal thermal capacity exceeding 50 MW (Order No. 541). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1110-08#Text

14.      Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (n.d.). National Emissions Reduction Plan for Large Combustion Plants. Adopted by the direction of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 08.11.2017 No796-r. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/796-2017-%D1%80#Text

15.      Liu, X., Luo, Z., Yang, X., Xie, G., Yu, Y., & Yu, C. (2020). Effect of limestone addition on NO emission during petroleum coke combustion in CFBB. Fuel, 270, 117475. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2020.117475

16.      Volchyn, I. A., Gaponych, L. S., & Zhoran, I. P. (2018). Selection of flue gas desulfurization technology for Ukrainian coal-fired thermal power plants. Scientific Works of the National University of Food Technologies, 24(4), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.24263/2225-2924-2018-24-4-18

17.      Volchyn, I., Dunayevska, N., Gaponych, L., Chernyavskyi, M., Topal, O., & Zasyadko, Ya. (2013). Prospects for the implementation of clean coal technologies in the energy sector of Ukraine. Kyiv: “Gnozis”. ISBN: 978-966-8840-97-5.

18.      Plashykhin, S. V. (2020). A guide to resource-efficient and clean production. Cement industry). Kyiv: Tsentr resursoefektyvnoho ta chystoho vyrobnytstva.

19.      IGD 34.02.305-2002 “Emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere from energy installations. Methodology for determination”.

20.      Chen-Lin Chou (2012). Sulfur in coals: A review of geochemistry and origins. International Journal of Coal Geology, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.009

21.      Zhang, Y.-M., Guo, G.-Z., & Wang, L.-P. (2019). Study on influencing factors of coal quality in coal blending. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 242, 022003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/242/2/022003

22.      Chernyavskyy, M. V., & Moiseenko, O. V. (2018). Development of methods for reducing sulfur dioxide emissions from thermal power plants based on the study of sulfur-containing mineral inclusions and changes in their content during enrichment of energy coal. 14 th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Coal Thermal Power Engineering: Ways of Reconstruction and Development”, (pp. 185-189). IVE NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://www.ceti-nasu.org.ua/upload/iblock/22f/22f649993fee6a325048218b9de4a64c.pdf

 

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (066) 379 72 44.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home About the journal EngCat Archive 2025 Content №6 2025 Scientific, technical and ecological aspects of expanding the fuel base of energy and cement production due to petroleum coke