Articles
Dialogue with generative artificial intelligence: is its “product” free from academic integrity violations?
/ 0
- Details
- Category: Content №2 2025
- Last Updated on 26 April 2025
- Published on 30 November -0001
- Hits: 554
Authors:
A.Artyukhov, orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-6891, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, the Slovak Republic; Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
N.Artyukhova, orcid.org/0000-0002-2408-5737, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, the Slovak Republic; Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.Dluhopolskyi*, orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-8762, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine; WSEI University, Lublin, the Republic of Poland, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.Adamyk, orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-4412, Loughborough University, Loughborough, the United Kingdom, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
B.Adamyk, orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-3854, Aston University, Birmingham, the United Kingdom, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (2): 181 - 188
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-2/181
Abstract:
Purpose. This article aims to analyze the role of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), specifically ChatGPT, in educational activities while addressing concerns regarding academic integrity. The study explores the ambiguous boundaries of GenAI’s involvement in coursework, its potential ethical and technological challenges, and the need for clear policies regulating its use in education.
Methodology. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining bibliometric analysis, direct interaction with ChatGPT, and a survey of Ukrainian students.
Findings. The findings of this study reveal several key insights into the use of GenAI, specifically ChatGPT, in educational settings and its impact on academic integrity. The findings underscore the need for educational institutions to develop and implement policies that regulate GenAI’s role in academic activities. While GenAI offers significant potential as a technological assistant, there are risks associated with its misuse, particularly concerning academic dishonesty and the erosion of academic standards.
Originality. The study’s originality lies in the comprehensive analysis of the problem of integrating GenAI, in particular ChatGPT, into the educational process from the point of view of academic integrity. For the first time, a systematic view of the stages of user interaction with GenAI has been proposed, potential points of violation of academic integrity at each of these stages are identified, and a “white box” concept has been developed to describe the use of GenAI, which allows controlling input and output parameters, minimizing risks. In addition, the study contains empirical data obtained as a result of a large-scale survey of Ukrainian students on their attitude to the use of GenAI in education, the level of awareness of university policies regarding GenAI, and support for the use of GenAI provided that academic integrity is observed. This outcome allows identifying the gap between existing practices and the need to develop effective strategies for integrating GenAI into the educational process.
Practical value. The practical value of the work lies in the fact that the study’s results can serve as the basis for the development of clear recommendations and policies on using GenAI in higher education institutions. The proposed “white box” model can be applied to create practical tools that will help students and teachers understand the potential risks and consequences of using GenAI and develop skills for responsible use of these technologies. The student survey results can be used to inform and ensure dialogue between stakeholders on the optimal ways of integrating GenAI into the educational space, taking into account ethical aspects and the need to maintain academic integrity.
Keywords: GenAI, academic integrity, bibliometric analysis, survey, politics
References.
1. Tchoketch-Kebir, H., & Madouri, A. (2024). Research leadership and high standards in economic forecasting: neural network models compared with etalon ARIMA models. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.8(1).220-233.2024
2. Roba, M., & Moulay, O. K. (2024). Risk management in using artificial neural networks. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.8(2).302-313.2024
3. Mujtaba, B. (2024). Clarifying ethical dilemmas in sharpening students’ artificial intelligence proficiency: dispelling myths about using AI tools in higher education. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.8(2).107-127.2024
4. Gonzalez Nuñez, J., & Bolognesi, M. (2024). Exploring team collaboration in the new metaverse (The 3D-AI Internet). SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(2), 314.
5. Bilan, S., Šuleř, P., Skrynnyk, O., Krajňáková, E., & Vasilyeva, T. (2022). Systematic bibliometric review of artificial intelligence technology in organizational management, development, change, and culture. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2022.13204
6. Leonov, S., Yarovenko, H., Boiko, A., & Dotsenko, T. (2019). Information system for monitoring banking transactions related to money laundering. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2422, 297.
7. Lyeonov, S., Żurakowska-Sawa, J., Kuzmenko, O., & Koibichuk, V. (2020). Gravitational and intellectual data analysis to assess the money laundering risk of financial institutions. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 259. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/18
8. Chiu, T. K. (2023). The impact of generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies, and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1. https://doi.org/
10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861
9. Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
10. Van Dis, E., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. (2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
11. Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
12. Nature Editorial (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science. Here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
13. Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, K., Baabdullah, A. M., …, & Ahuja, M. (2023). So, what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
15. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., …, & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
16. Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations, and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
17. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
18. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
19. Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4333415
20. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educational Sciences, 13, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
21. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
22. Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology, 307(2), e230163. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163
23. Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help with scientific writing? Critical Care, 27, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
24. Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
25. GenAI (2024). Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis. Retrieved from https://openpraxis.org/articles/10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
26. Kasianiuk, K. (2016). White box, black box and self-organization: A system-to-environment approach to leadership. Kybernetes, 45(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2015-0104
27. Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., Khan, Z. R., Santos, R., Pavletic, P., & Kravjar, J. (2023). ENAI recommendations on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
28. Okulich-Kazarin, V., Artyukhov, A., Skowron, Ł., Artyukhova, N., Cwynar, W., & Dluhopolskyi, O. (2024). Sustainability of higher education: study of student opinions about the possibility of replacing teachers with AI technologies. Sustainability, 16(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010055
29. Volk, I., Ivanov, O., Artyukhov, A., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Artyukhova, N. (2024). Comparative study of pre-attentive visual attention analysis instruments: 3M VAS and iMotions as AI-based vs human-based experiments. In E. Faure, et al. (Eds.). Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics (ITEST-2024). Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 221, 14-26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71801-4_2
Newer news items:
- Confirmatory factor analysis of management system standards using first & second-order analysis - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Formation of value orientations of the personality of a higher education student in the economic field using the Ukrainian language - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Modeling obstacle avoidance strategies in UAV groups - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Development of a multipurpose geographic database for urban infrastructure management in Ho Chi Minh city (Vietnam) - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Discrete perceptron based on probabilistic estimates of shifted synaptic signals - 26/04/2025 20:53
Older news items:
- The right to decent, safe and healthy working conditions: organizational and legal guarantees of its provision in Ukraine - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Environmental management: assessing the reliability of ecosystems to ensure their environmental sustainability - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Influence of the protective potential distribution of a steel underground pipeline on electrochemical corrosion processes - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Implementation of a computational experiment for shock interaction of spherical bodies - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Determination of the velocities of the points of the third-class mechanism with three leading links using the graph-analytical method - 26/04/2025 20:53
- System for monitoring the strength and dynamic characteristics of freight wagons in operation - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Effect of heat treatment on the mechanical properties of nylon parts in additive manufacturing - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Si and Mn effect on mechanical properties and linear shrinking of non-magnetic Cu-Al system cast bronzes - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Determination of the causes of rolling surface damage during operation of the railway wheels - 26/04/2025 20:53
- Testing of fine classification sifter in the processing and disposal of mining waste - 26/04/2025 20:53