Науковий вісник НГУ

A methodological approach to assessing the parameters of technological change impact on the economic sustainability of enterprises

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №4 2025

Last Updated on 26 August 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 3353

Authors:

V. Prokhorova, orcid.org/0000-0003-2552-2131, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. Yemelyanov, orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-1646, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. Koleshchuk, orcid.org/0000-0001-8995-5206, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine,  e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

H. Pylypenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-4320, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Yu. Pylypenko*, orcid.org/0000-0002-4772-1492, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (4): 227 - 236

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-4/227

Abstract:

Purpose. Creating a methodological basis for measuring the interrelation between the introduction of resource-saving technologies and the economic sustainability of enterprises.

Methodology. In the course of the study, the following methods were used: grouping and generalisation (in the classification of types of economic sustainability of companies), economic and mathematical modelling (in the development of indicators for assessing the economic sustainability of enterprises), system analysis (in the creation of methodological techniques for assessing the impact of resource-saving technologies on the economic sustainability of enterprises), methods of economic analysis and technical and economic calculations (in testing the methodological approach on a sample of industrial enterprises), a questionnaire method (in surveying business owners and managers about their implementation of energy-saving technologies), and methods of mathematical statistics (in processing the survey results).

Findings. Based on the allocation of types of economic sustainability of enterprises, the characteristics of high, moderate, low and unsatisfactory economic sustainability of enterprises are substantiated. The indicators for its assessment are proposed, their ability to serve as indicators of the ability of enterprises to ensure their sustainable functioning is demonstrated. A methodological approach has been developed to assess the impact of resource-saving technologies on the economic sustainability of enterprises. The analytical capabilities of this approach have been tested on a sample of 60 Ukrainian enterprises that have implemented resource-saving technologies in terms of replacing natural gas. The results showed that energy-saving technologies have a significant positive impact on the economic sustainability of companies.

Originality. An improved classification of the types of economic sustainability of enterprises is proposed based on the following features: method of calculation, realisation of reserves for increase, degree of generalisation and indicators whose values may deteriorate. Indicators for assessing the local sustainability of enterprises by product prices, variable costs, fixed costs, natural sales volumes, and costs of a certain type of production resources are formed. A methodological basis for assessing the impact of resource-saving technologies on the economic sustainability of enterprises has been created, which provides for obtaining information on the actual or expected improvement of various indicators of economic sustainability of companies as a result of increasing the level of resource-saving technologies. The article establishes the existence of a positive impact of energy-saving technologies on the economic sustainability of enterprises regarding technological modernisation, based on the use of natural gas.

Practical value. The obtained results can be used by enterprises in developing measures to improve economic sustainability, as well as in assessing the expected economic consequences of the introduction of resource-saving technologies by companies.

Keywords: enterprise, economic sustainability, resource saving, innovations, technological change, production resource

References.

1. Pylypenko, H., Fedorova, N., Lytvynenko, N., & Pylypenko, Yu. (2025). Breakthrough technologies of social transformations: devising an identification methodology. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13(134)), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326555

2. Chowdhury, J., Hu, Y., Haltas, I., Balta-Ozkan, N., & Varga, L. (2018). Reducing industrial energy demand in the UK: A review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 1153-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.040

3. Bhandari, D., Singh, R. K., & Garg, S. K. (2019). Prioritization and evaluation of barriers intensity for implementation of cleaner technologies: A framework for sustainable production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.038

4. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Worrell, E., & Pugliese, G. (2013). An empirical investigation of energy efficiency barriers in Italian manufacturing SMEs. Energy, 49, 444-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.012

5. Zhang, Z., Jin, X., Yang, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2013). An empirical study on the institutional factors of energy conservation and emissions reduction: Evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Policy, 57, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.011

6. Backman, F. (2017). Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Swedish Non-Energy-Intensive Micro- and Small-Sized Enterprises-A Case Study of a Local Energy Programme. Energies, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010100

7. Giraudet, L. (2020). Energy efficiency as a credence good: A review of informational barriers to energy savings in the building sector. Energy Economics, 87, 104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104698

8. Smiesova, V., Ivanova, M., Faizova, S., Zolotukhina, L., & Karpenko, R. (2020). Strengthening of the Power-property Tendencies and Forecasting their Impact on the Implementation of Interests of Households, Enterprises and the State. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 28(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.46585/sp28020113

9. Palm, J., & Backman, F. (2020). Energy efficiency in SMEs: overcoming the communication barrier. Energy Efficiency, 13(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09839-7

10.      Alvarado, R., Tillaguango, B., Toledo, E., Murshed, M., & Işık, C. (2024). Links between technological innovation, financial efficiency and environmental quality using quantile regressions: The role of foreign direct investment, institutional quality and natural resources. Journal of Open Innovation, 10(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100360

11.      Pan, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Shen, Z., & Song, M. (2023). The impact of platform economy on enterprise value mediated by technological innovation. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114051

12.      Chen, Y., & Jiang, Z. (2024). The Impact of Enterprise Technological Innovation on Environmental Performance ‒ An Industry Perspective. Sustainability, 16, 6457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156457

13.      Nagdiev, O. (2023). Evaluation of the innovation-investment factor for augmenting the competitiveness of construction enterprises. Economics of the transport complex, 42, 143-154. Retrieved from https://dspace.khadi.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/17706

14.      Andrew, A., Adebayo, T., Lasisi, T., & Muoneke, O. (2024). Moderating roles of technological innovation and economic complexity in financial development-environmental quality nexus of the BRICS economies. Technology in Society, 78, 102581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102581

15.      Liu, Y., Liu, S., Wu, Z., & Xiao, Y. (2022). How do technological innovations affect corporate investment and hiring? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101759

16.      Stanitsas, M., Kirytopoulos, K., & Leopoulos, V. (2020). Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of the construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123774

17.      Maynard, D., Vidigal, M., Farage, P., Zandonadi, R., Nakano, E., & Botelho, R. (2020). Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability Indicators Applied to Food Services: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 12, 1804.

18.      Tian, N., Tang, S., Che, A., & Wu, P. (2020). Measuring regional transport sustainability using super-efficiency SBM-DEA with weighting preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118474

19.      Ghenai, C., Albawab, M., & Bettayeb, M. (2020). Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renewable Energy, 146, 580-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.157

20.      Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Parkes, G., Tuyet, N., Long, D., & Ha, T. (2022). Impact of organizational factors on the circular economy practices and sustainable performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Journal of Business Research, 147, 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.077

21.      Shibaeva, N., Baban, T., Prokhorova V., Karlova O., Girzheva O., & Krutko, M. (2019). Methodological bases of estimating the efficiency of organisational and economic mechanism of regulatory policy in agriculture. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 5, 160-171. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2019.05.SI.18

22.      Prokhorova, V., Protsenko, V., Bezuglaya, Y., & Us, J. (2018). The optimisation algorithm for the directions of influence of risk factors on the system that manages the potential of machine-building enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(1(94)), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.139513

23.      Hernita, H., Surya, B., Perwira, I., Abubakar, H., & Idris, M. (2021). Economic business sustainability and strengthening human resource capacity based on increasing the productivity of small and medium enterprises (SMES) in Makassar city, Indonesia. Sustainabi­lity, 13(6), 3177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063177

24.      Babenko, V., Baksalova, O., Prokhorova, V., Dykan, V., Ovchynnikova, V., & Chobitok, V. (2021). Information and Consulting Service Using in the Organization of Personnel Management. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 38-3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v38i4.3999

25.      Pylypenko, Yu., Prokhorova, V., Halkiv, L., Koleshchuk, O., & Dubiei, Yu. (2022). Innovative intellectual capital in the system of factors of technical and technological development. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (6), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/181

26.      Lutfi, A., Al-Khasawneh, A. L., Almaiah, M. A., Alsyouf, A., & Alrawad, M. (2022). Business sustainability of small and medium enterprises during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of AIS implementation. Sustainability, 14(9), 5362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095362

27.      Smerichevskyi, S., Kryvovyazyuk, I., Prokhorova, V., Usarek, W., & Ivashchenko, А. (2021). Expediency of symptomatic diagnostics application of enterprise export-import activity in the disruption conditions of world economy sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 628, 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012040

28.      Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2023). How digitalisation supports a sustainable business model: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122146

29.      Pizzi, S., Corbo, L., & Caputo, A. (2021). Fintech and SMEs sustainable business models: Reflections and considerations for a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125217

30.      Nudurupati, S., Budhwar, P., Pappu, R., Chowdhury, S., Kondala, M., Chakraborty, A., & Ghosh, S. (2022). Transforming sustainability of Indian small and medium-sized enterprises through circular economy adoption. Journal of Business Research, 149, 250-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.036

• < Prev
• Next >