Науковий вісник НГУ

Sustainable development management: basic principles and tools of influence

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №4 2025

Last Updated on 26 August 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 3358

Authors:

O. Materynska*, orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-7676, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Vinnytsia, Ukrainee-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. Klymchuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-9427-9561, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T. Kronivets, orcid.org/0000-0002-5506-3418, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, E-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L. Romanchuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-2505-6743, State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

N. Burlaka, orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-2657, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (4): 217 - 226

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-4/217

Abstract:

Purpose. Assessing the impact of war on sustainable development management (SDM); identifying adjustments to management principles and tools required by martial law (SDM); developing approaches and organizational forms of business processes to achieve enterprise viability as the main condition for sustainability during war.

Methodology. The method of dialectical cognition allowed us to rethink the concept of “sustainable development” (SD) in wartime and to propose its interpretation, to point out the need to review priorities in achieving SD goals. The method of scientific analysis allowed introducing adjustments to the BANI approach and to indicate that during large-scale hostilities, enterprises should be considered as open non-equilibrium systems and apply a new approach to finding a compromise in the structure of “man ‒ society ‒ nature”. The method of analysis and synthesis made it possible to emphasize the importance for sustainable development not only of first-order factors, but also of the reverse impact of second-order factors. Using the content analysis method, the features of sustainable development management during ML (martial law) are identified.

Findings. The interpretation of the concept of SD in wartime is proposed. It is indicated that war changes priorities in achieving SDM goals, which requires a compromise approach and interpretation of these goals at the enterprise management level. Management must achieve a rational balance between defined goals, practical needs and available resources to ensure them. The principles, universal tools, components of SDM are indicated and the corrections that war makes to their list are indicated. The features of SDM during war are indicated. Adjustments to the conceptual BANI approach are proposed.

Originality. The approach to cycles and subcycles of viability in production and business processes is proposed as a promising one for acquiring sustainability of enterprises in times of crisis and war. A project-oriented approach is proposed as the most suitable organizational form for this.

Practical value. The recommendations provided regarding cycles and subcycles of viability, selection of tools from the SMART matrix, and the BANI approach will allow the use of SDM methods during wartime.

Keywords: management, sustainable development, strategy, sustainability, principles, tools, social partnership

References.

1. Moutinho, A., Sousa, P., & Tereso, A. (2025). Applying the PRiSM™ Methodology to Raise Awareness of the Importance of Using Sustainable Project Management Practices in Organizations. Systems, 13, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020069

2. Dos Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., De Oliveira, C. H., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 212, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270

3. Kronivets, T., Yakovenko, O., Tymoshenko, Ye., Ilnytskyi, M., Iasechko, S., & Iasechko, M. (2023). Legal Principles of Using Artificial Intelligence in Educational Activities as a Factor of Economic Development. Review of Economics and Finance, 21. https://doi.org/10.55365/1923.x2023.21.208

4. Paul, A., Shukla, N., Paul, S. K., & Trianni, A. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management and multi-criteria decision-making methods: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(13), 7104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137104

5. Silva, C., Magano, J., Moskalenko, A., Nogueira, T., Dinis, M. A. P., & Pedrosa e Sousa, H. F. (2020). Sustainable management systems standards (SMSS): Structures, roles, and practices in corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 12(15), 5892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155892

6. Vidal, F. (2024). The quest for a sustainable industry: mining, path dependency and post-carbon regime in the European Arctic. Mineral Economics, 024, 00451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-024-00451-0

7. Carmagnac, L., Silva, M. E., & Fritz, M. M. (2024). Exploring sustainable development goals adoption in supply chain management: A typology of coexisting institutional logics. Business strategy and the environment, 33(4), 3463-3479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3661

8. Bocken, N. M. P., & Short, S. W. (2021). Unsustainable business models – Recognising and resolving institutionalised social and environmental harm, Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127828

9. Vetsko, T. M. (2019). Sustainable development of the enterprise: problems and prospects. Actual problems of economics and management, 13. Retrieved from http://ape.fmm.kpi.ua/article/view/153856

10.      Fritz, M. M., & Cordova, M. (2023). Developing managers’ mindset to lead more sustainable supply chains. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100108

11.      Chaliuk, Y. (2022). Global socio-economic development in VUCA, SPOD, DEST and BANI world. Economy and society, 36. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-36-21

12.      Kapinos, H., & Larionova, K. (2023). Problems of management of Ukraine’s sustainable development in the conditions of war. Modeling the development of the economic systems, 7(13), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2023-7-13

13.      Kopchak, Y., Matveyev, M., & Pugachov, V. (2023). Transformation of modern management in the conditions of war. Economy and society, 51. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-51-24

14.      Bilous, S., & Bryvus, A. (2024). Adapting the business strategy of the enterprise to the conditions of a military conflict. Economy and society, 61. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-61-106

15.      Bolkvadze, N. (2024). Management in conditions of instability and war. Economy and society, 70. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-172

16.      National Bank of Ukraine (2025). Statistics of the financial sector Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/sector-financial

17.      Kulinich, T., Materynska, O., Aleskerova, Y., Kuzmenko, H., & Balian, I. (2023). Leadership in Unstable Conditions: Change Management Strategies and Effective Crisis Management for Achieving Success. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 2781-2788. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.236

18.      Nitsenko, V., Ivashchenko, A., Radko, V., Sereda, V., Kuzmenko, O., & Dimov, I. (2024). Financial Potential for Expanding the Opportunities of a Small Enterprise Under the Conditions of Sustainable Development. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(59), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.59.2024.4524

19.      Zimek, M., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2024). Systemic sustainability assessment: Analyzing environmental and social impacts of actions on sustainable development. Cleaner Production Letters, 7, 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100064

20.      Levytska, I., Klymchuk, A., Kozhushko, S., & Klymchuk, О. (2024). Research on the role of investments in ensuring sustainable development of machinery enterprises in European Union countries. Academy Review, 2(61), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-20

21.      Latysheva, O., Rovenska, V., Smyrnova, I., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Management of the sustainable development of machine-building enterprises: a sustainable development space approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1), 328-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2019-0419

22.      Buriak, I., Redko, K., Chornovol, A., & Orlenko, O. V. (2022). Socio-economic aspects of sustainable development of Ukraine in wartime (European integration aspects). Scientific notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, 34, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7221052

23.      Withisuphakorn, P., Batra, I., Parameswar, N., & Dhir, S. (2019). Sustainable Development in Practice: Case Study of L’Oréal, Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 13, Special Edition. https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/V13ISSP/ART-4

24.      Burlaka, N. I. (2019). Development of investment activity of Ukrainian enterprises. Investments: practice and experience. Topic: Economics, 8, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2019.8.37

25.      Karpenko, O., & Maizel, S. (2023). Theoretical aspects of ensuring enterprises sustainable development. Economic Synergy, Higher Educational Institution Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific & Technical University, 1, 98-111. https://doi.org/10.53920/ES-2023-1-8

26.      Edeh, F. O., Zayed, N. M., Darwish, S., Nitsenko, V., Hanechko, I., & Islam, K. M. A. (2023). Impression Management and Employee Contextual Performance in Service Organizations (Enterprises). Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 366-384. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-05

• < Prev
• Next >