Науковий вісник НГУ

Building a technological ecosystem in the context of digital transformation

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №4 2025

Last Updated on 26 August 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 3243

Authors:

H. Y. Ostrovska*, orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-2258, Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L. S. Verbovska, orcid.org/0000-0002-2509-1194, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L. S. Tarayevska, orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-0881, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I. B. Haliuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-1954, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M. Ju. Petryna, orcid.org/0000-0003-2233-6341, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (4): 195 - 205

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-4/195

Abstract:

Purpose. To substantiate scientific, methodological and practical developments aimed at transforming the national technological ecosystem and providing recommendations for the implementation of an adaptive digital business model focused on the effective integration of enterprises into technological ecosystems.

Methodology. The study uses general scientific methods: comparison, analogy, analysis and synthesis, system analysis, multi-criteria evaluation and matrix modeling methods. We use holistic, network, and cluster approaches to obtain the results of the research.

Findings. The article identifies the priorities for the transformation of the national technological ecosystem and offers recommendations for accelerating its development towards the formation of sustainable networks of interconnected enterprises based on advanced digital manufacturing technologies. The authors propose a new understanding of the “technological ecosystem” category’s essence. We identify the key features and components of the technological ecosystem. The paper substantiates the principles of adapting digital business models to the technological profiles of both enterprises and the ecosystems into which they integrate. In accordance with the level of technological maturity and digital capabilities of enterprises and ecosystems, we offer digital frameworks adapted to changes in the technological space. We analyzed models and trajectories of integration taking into account the digital context and developed a toolkit for the effective functioning of an enterprise in a technological ecosystem. The study outlines the prospects for promoting the management practices of technological ecosystems by developing an integrated model that balances environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The model highlights the importance of digital and technological maturity, collaboration, and innovation as drivers of ecosystem adaptability and resilience.

Originality. We developed an adaptive digital business model focused on the effective integration of enterprises into technological ecosystems in the face of technological gaps and imbalances in industry potentials. The paper proposes a matrix of management projects, which, based on the assessment of technological (including digital) levels, determines the positions of enterprises and integration models that provide enterprises with flexibility in the context of digital transformation. The implementation of the integrated model contributes to the development of the ecosystem’s technological potential, intensification of regional innovations, and achievement of a synergistic effect on a national scale.

Practical value. The recommendations can be used by technology companies, eco-industrial parks’ management, and industrial symbiosis facilitators to develop program, project, and other long-term documents that formalize the business model, strategy, and policy for building the national technology ecosystem.

Keywords: technological ecosystem, digital business model, innovation, logistics, communications, education, management, technological maturity

References.

1. Vaillant, Y., Lafuente, E., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2023). Assessment of Industrial Pre-Determinants for Territories with Active Product-Service Innovation Ecosystems. Technovation, 119, 102658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102658

2. Costa Fernandes, S., & Rozenfeld, H. (2024). Business model innovation through the design of circular product-service system value propositions: A method proposal. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5325-5345. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3759

3. Appio, F. P., Frattini, F., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Neirotti, P. (2021). Digital transformation and innovation management: A synthesis of existing research and an agenda for future studies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12562

4. Marković, G., Sučić, S., & Tabak, Z. (2022). Capabilities for platform ecosystem adoption: The case of an industrial incumbent company. 45^th Jubilee International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), (pp. 95-100). https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO55190.2022.9803652

5. Lyu, Y., Tian, J., & Chen, L. (2023). Enabling sustainable chemical manufacturing from product to industrial ecosystem. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 192, 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106915

6. Brenk, S., Burmeister, C., Diener, K., & Lüttgens, D. (2025). Boon or bane of open value creation: The impact of business model design and relational trust on competitive advantage. Long Range Planning, 58(2), 102507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102507

7. Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021). AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research. Journal of Business Research, 127, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.016

8. Dutta, G., & Kumar, D. R. (2024). Strategic digitalization in SMEs of developing economies: Digital twin driven engineering value chain for customer-centricity. Procedia Computer Science, 232, 2654-2669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.083

9. Kim, D., & Cho, K. (2023). Digital transformation characteristics of the semiconductor industry ecosystem. Sustainability, 15(1), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010483

10.      Reibenspiess, V., Katharina, D., Andreas, E., & Heinz-Theo, W. (2022). Tapping into the wealth of employees’ ideas: Design principles for a digital intrapreneurship platform. Information and Management, 59(3), 103287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103287

11.      Chang, Y., Ming, X., Chen, Zh., Zhou, T., Liao, X., & Song, W. (2023). Stakeholder requirement evaluation of smart industrial service ecosystem under Pythagorean fuzzy environment for complex industrial contexts: A case study of renewable energy park. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 55, 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101823

12.      Costa, E. (2024). Industry 5.0 and SDG 9: A symbiotic dance towards sustainable transformation. Sustainability Earth Reviews, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00073-y

13.      Pattinson, S., Damij, N., El Maalouf, N., Bazi, S., Elsahn, Z., Hil­liard, R., & Cunningham, J. (2023). Building green innovation networks for people, planet, and profit: A multi-level, multi-value approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 115, 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.016

14.      Ostrovska, H., Tsikh, H., Strutynska, I., Kinash, I., Pietukhova, O., Golovnya, O., & Shehynska, N. (2021). Building an effective model of intelligent entrepreneurship development in digital economy. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(13(114)), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.244916

15.      Duan, W., Madasi, J.D., & Khurshid, A. (2022). How network structure and exchange rate volatility drive the industrial ecosystem towards collapse: A global perspective. Economic Research, 36(1), 1688-1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2092524

16.      Kinash, I., Tarayevska, L., Petryna, M., Stavnycha, N., Ivanchuk, T., & Bleikher, O. (2024). Formation of innovative infrastructure in the context of project-oriented management of the oil and gas industry. Mineral Resources & Energy Congress. E3S Web of Conferences, 526. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452601015

17.      Petryna, M., Stavnycha, N., Tarayevska, L., Rishchuk, L., & Kushlyk, O. (2020). A methodological approach to the evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative projects. The International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters, 166. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613018

18.      Ostrovska, H. Y. (2022). Implementation of advanced digital manufacturing technologies within the framework of sustainable development concept: Problems and prospects. Economic Bulletin of Donbas, 67(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2022-1(67)-59-68

19.      Li, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92-93, 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004

20.      Nambisan, S., & Baron, R.A. (2021). On the costs of digital entrepreneurship: Role conflict, stress, and venture performance in digital platform-based ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 125, 520-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.037

21.      Botha, C., Schachtebeck, C., Nieuwenhuizen, C., & Bossink, B. (2020). A framework for digital transformation and business model innovation. Management, 25(2), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.25.2.6

22.      Kohtamäki, M., Leminen, S., & Parida, V. (2024). Conceptualizing digital business models (DBM): Framing the interplay between digitalization and business models. Technovation, 133, 103013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103013

23.      Prokop, V., Zapletal, D., Stejskal, J., Giglio, C., & Appolloni, A. (2024). Business model innovation elements and product innovation radicalness: Central European lessons for innovation leaders and followers. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 471-506. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3004

24.      DealBook of Ukraine 2025: Covering tech investment deals. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/dealbook-of-ukraine-2025-edition-aventures-capital/276225711

25.      Fang, S., Brenes, A. M., & Brusoni, S. (2023) Technology intelligence and digitalization in the manufacturing industry. Research Technology Management, 66(5), 22-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2023.2234758

26.      Han, W., Li, X., Zhu, W., Lu, R., & Zu, X. (2024). Knowledge digitization and high-tech firm performance: A moderated mediation model incorporating business model innovation and entrepreneurial orientation. Technology in Society, 77, 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102536

27.      Kalenyuk, I., Lukyanenko, L., Tsymbal, L., Stankevics, A., & Uninets, I. (2023). The smart manufacturing: imperatives and trends. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 52(5), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.5.52.2023.4126

28.      Bamel, N., Kumar, S., Bamel, U., Lim, W. M., & Sureka, R. (2024). The state of the art of innovation management: Insights from a retrospective review of the European Journal of Innovation Management. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(3), 825-850. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2022-0361

29.      Le, T. T., & Mohiuddin, M. (2024). Organizational inertia and firm performance: mediating role of green business model, and open innovation in manufacturing SMEs of emerging markets. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(2), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00384-1

30.      Ostrovska, H., Andrushkiv, B., Tsikh, H., Boichyk, I., & Stav­nycha, N. (2022). Formation of priorities for the development of intellectual potential in the conditions of establishing a knowledge-based economy. Financial and Credit Activities: Problems of Theory and Practice, 42(1), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.42.2022.3561

• < Prev
• Next >